Parkinson v. Wentworth
Parkinson v. Wentworth
Opinion of the Court
The plea is certainly bad in point of form. It should have concluded by praying judgment that the plaintiff be barred of his action until, &c.
* Since, however, the point is of a public nature, the [ * 27 ] defendant may plead anew, paying costs of the action to this time.
If a neutral become an enemy pending the suit, this should be pleaded in abatement, as it only suspends the action. — 1 Chitty, 514, 7th ed. — 3 Chitty, 911. — 15 East, 260. — Harmer vs. Kingston, 3 Camp. 153. — Levine vs. Taylor, 12 Mass. Rep. 8. — Hutchinson vs. Brock, post, 119. — Langdon § Al. vs. Potter, post, 113. — It seems the plea in many cases may be either in bar or in abatement. — 1 Chitty, 481 514.—3 Chitty, 911, 7th ed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Samuel Parkinson versus Philip Wentworth, Jun.
- Cited By
- 5 cases
- Status
- Published