Richardson v. Eastman
Richardson v. Eastman
12 Mass. 505
Richardson v. Eastman
Opinion of the Court
But the Court, after taking time to examine the authorities cited, held the declaration well enough after verdict. The jury must have had evidence of the number of the several articles taken; at least they would have found damages only for so many as were proved.
Bigelow and Fay, for the plaintiff.
Motion overruled.
Vide note to Taylor vs. Wells, 2 Saund. 74.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.