President, Directors, & Co. v. Chamberlin
Cases that cite this one
12 later published cases cite this decision.
- Ward v. . Anderson (N.C. 1892)
- TUCKER v. Moreland (Supreme Court of the United States 1836)
- Askey v. Williams (Tex. 1889)
- Losey v. Bond (Ind. 1884)
- Allen v. Poole (Miss. 1877)
- Law v. Long (Ind. 1873)
- Webb v. Hall (Me. 1853)
- Fauntleroy's Heirs v. Dunn (Ky. Ct. App. 1843)
- Robbins v. Eaton (Superior Court of New Hampshire 1840)
- Kendall v. Lawrence (Mass. 1839)
- Hoit v. Underhill (Superior Court of New Hampshire 1838)
- Bool v. Mix (New York Supreme Court 1837)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
But the Court agreed in opinion, with the judge who sat at the trial, that the deed of the infant to the demandants was voidable only. The deed to the tenants was a recognition of it, and made it good and effectual. The cases from New York were different. The second deed in this case was a confirmation of the former one, and nod no operation to avoid it. Let judgment be entered for the demandants, as on mortgage.
Gold for the demandants,
Barnaby vs. Barnaby, 1 Pick. 221. — Oliver vs. Houdlett & Al. 13 Mass. Rep 239. — Roof vs. Stafford, 7 Cowen, 9. — Belton vs. Briggs, 4 Dess. 465.— Course vs Birdsall, 1 Johns. Cas. 127. — Jackson vs. Todd, 6 Johns. 257. — Jackson vs. Burchin, 14 Johns. 124. — Wamsley vs. Lindenberger, 2 Rand. 478. — Roberts vs. Wiggin, 1 N H. R. 73. — Wright vs. Steele, 2 N. H. R. 55. — Kline vs. Bebee, 6 Conn. R. 494.— White vs. Flora, 2 Tenn. 431. — Sed vide 1 Atkinson's Conveyancing, 229.— 1 Prest. Abstr. 324. — 4 Barton, Conv. 9. — Dixon, tit. Deeds, 471. — Swansey vs. Administrator of Vanderheyden, 10 Johns. R. 33. — M'Gillis vs. Howe, 3 N. H. R. 348.— Curtin vs Patton, 11 Serg. Rawle. 305.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.