Commonwealth v. Littlejohn
Cases that cite this one
14 later published cases cite this decision.
- Bates v. State (Allen Circuit Court 1906)
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Schmidt (New York Surrogate's Court 1904)
- Commonwealth v. Hayden (Mass. 1895)
- State v. Hughes (Kan. 1886)
- Jacobsen v. Siddal (Or. 1885)
- Bussom v. Forsyth (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1880)
- State v. Medbury (R.I. 1867)
- Gahagan v. People (New York Supreme Court 1853)
- Rose v. Niles (District Court, S.D. New York 1849)
- Cameron v. State (Ala. 1848)
- State v. Rood (Vt. 1840)
- State v. Kean (Superior Court of New Hampshire 1839)
- State v. Roswell (Conn. 1827)
- Commonwealth v. Norcross (Mass. 1813)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Upon an indictment against two persons for lascivious cohabitation, one of the parties be'ing married, such marriage must be proved by the record of the clergyman, or by witnesses present at the ceremony.
Quære whether, as the allegation was no otherwise material but as being ue scriptrve of the person intended, the proof of marriage was 'not sufficient. — Vide 3 Starkie, Ev. 1580. — Sull's case, Leach, 1005. — Mary Graham’s case, Leach, 619.— State vs. France, Overt. R. 434. — 2 Phil. Ev. 286, 7th Land. ed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.