Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1820

Shaw v. Reed

Shaw v. Reed
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Decided October 15, 1820
16 Mass. 450

Counsel

Beal, for the plaintiff., Wood, for the defendant.

Shaw v. Reed

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Trespass does not lie in this case, for the writ being good at the time it was served, the arrest was not tortious. The justice had jurisdiction of the cause, and it was only by reason of an event subsequent to the service of the writ, that it became inoperative. The plaintiff’s remedy is by an action of the case against the defendant, if the justice’s absence arose from his negligence ; or against the justice, if he was notified of the process, and voluntarily or negligently absented himself.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.