Byrne v. Crowninshield
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Robert E. Dupuis v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Portland (Me. 2025)
- Galliher v. State Mutual Life Ins. (Ala. 1907)
- Van Schuyver v. Hartman (United States District Court for the District of Alaska 1902)
- McConnell v. Spicker (S.D. 1901)
- In re Shepard (District Court, N.D. New York 1868)
- Tagart v. Indiana (Mo. 1851)
- Hays v. Cage (Tex. 1847)
- Dudley v. Kimball (Superior Court of New Hampshire 1845)
- Gulick v. Loder (N.J. 1832)
- Bulger v. Roche (Mass. 1831)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The case cited by the plaintiff’s counsel from our own reports, is decisive of this action. The principle has often been recognized, that the laws of the country where the contract is
A difference has been attempted to be shown in this case, from that of Pearsall & Al. vs. Dwight, & Al. in that both the parties to this action were inhabitants of New York at the time when the contract was made, and the cause of action accrued. But that fact was assumed in the case referred to. The difference then does not exist
Defendant's plea bad.
[Bulger vs. Roche, 11 Pick. 36.—Le Roy vs. Crowninshield, 2 Mason, 151.— Williams vs. Jones 13 East. 439.—Wilson vs. Appleton, post, 180.—Ed.]
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.