Inhabitants of Reading v. Inhabitants of Tewksbury
Inhabitants of Reading v. Inhabitants of Tewksbury
Opinion of the Court
The Court were of opinion, that the jury ought to have found the reason, why Pearson was not taxed ; whether it was on account of age, infirmity, or poverty, or through mistake, or from some other cause. The assessors might have
New trial granted.
Burton v. Wakefield, 4 N. Hamp. R. 47 ; Weare v. New Boston, 3 N. Hamp. B 203.
So a person does not acquire a legal settlement by residing in a town ten years together and paying takes there for any five of these ten years, if with in that time he is committed to gaol, and while there applies for and receives relief as a pauper from the gaoler. East Sudbury v. Sudbury, 12 Pick. 1. See also Westbrook v. Bowdoinham,7 Greenl. 363 ; Attleborough v. Middleborough, 10 Pick. 378
Reference
- Full Case Name
- The Inhabitants of Reading versus The Inhabitants of Tewksbury
- Status
- Published