Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1826

Commonwealth v. Paull

Commonwealth v. Paull
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Decided October 28, 1826
21 Mass. 251

Counsel

Bacon, for the commonwealth., H. Cushman, for the respondent.

Commonwealth v. Paull

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The St. 1809, c. 108, § 18, provides, that the testimony of the clerk shall be evidence of notice to the men of any company, to appear at a time and place appointed, for any military duty, but it does not allow him to testify to other facts ; and by the general principles of law he is an incompetent witness, being interested in the fine to be imposed.1

Proceedings quashed.

See Revised Stat. c. 12, § 112, p. 128; Burt v. Dimmock, 11 Pick. 356.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.