Newhall v. Pierce
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Newhall v. Pierce, 22 Mass. 450 (Mass. 1827)
Newhall v. Pierce
Opinion of the Court
It is not necessary to decide whether the deed and bond constituted a mortgage ; for if they did as between the plaintiff and Nehemiah Newhall, they bad not that operation in regard to third persons, as the bond was not recorded. The statute .is clear, that a bond of defeasance must be put upon record in order to prevent an attachment.
Plaintiff nonsuit.
See Revised Stat. c. 59, § 27.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Darius Newhall versus Ethan Pierce
- Status
- Published