Bursler v. Bursler

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Bursler v. Bursler, 22 Mass. 427 (Mass. 1827)

Bursler v. Bursler

Opinion

Alimony allowed without regard to the husbaud’s income alone, the illness of the wife requiring extraordinary expenses.

Upon a petition for an increase of alimony, it appeared that the parties were divorced a mensa et thoro in 1826, on the application of the wife, and 30 dollars a year allowed as alimony ; that she was now afflicted with a disease which rendered her unable to labor for her support, and occasioned extraordinary expenses to nearly the whole amount of the alimony; that her children were not able to support her, although they had contributed for that purpose ; that in the opinion of her physician she could not live longer than a year; that the husband’s real estate was worth about 2100 dollars, and his personal 300, and that his debts amounted to about 600 ; and that his income from the real estate was about 42 dollars, and from his labor about as much more.

Costs for the petitioner.2

See Revised Stat. c. 76, § 31, 36.

See Revised Stat. c. 76, § 37.

Reference

Full Case Name
Susannah Bursler versus John Bursler
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published