Bursler v. Bursler
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Hribal v. Hribal (Ohio Circuit Courts 1908)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Alimony allowed without regard to the husbaud’s income alone, the illness of the wife requiring extraordinary expenses.
Upon a petition for an increase of alimony, it appeared that the parties were divorced a mensa et thoro in 1826, on the application of the wife, and 30 dollars a year allowed as alimony ; that she was now afflicted with a disease which rendered her unable to labor for her support, and occasioned extraordinary expenses to nearly the whole amount of the alimony; that her children were not able to support her, although they had contributed for that purpose ; that in the opinion of her physician she could not live longer than a year; that the husband’s real estate was worth about 2100 dollars, and his personal 300, and that his debts amounted to about 600 ; and that his income from the real estate was about 42 dollars, and from his labor about as much more.
Costs for the petitioner.
See Revised Stat. c. 76, § 31, 36.
See Revised Stat. c. 76, § 37.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.