Tileston v. Nettleton
Tileston v. Nettleton
Opinion of the Court
The principles laid down by the Court of Common Pleas are certainly correct, and well maintained by the authorities cited. The true question is, was the prom ise of the defendant original or collateral.
Judgment affirmed.
See Roberts on Frauds, 216 to 225; Swan v. Nesmith, 7 Pick. 220; Chitty on Contracts, (3d Am. ed.) 202 et seq; Elder v. Warfield, 7 Harr. & Johns. 391; Cutler v. Hinton, 6 Randolph, 509; Slingerland v. Morse, 7 Johns. R. (2nd ed.) 463, note a; Skelton v. Brewster, 8 Johns. R. 376; Bailey v. Freeman, 11 Johns. R. 221; Chase v. Day, 17 Johns. R. (2nd ed.) 115, note a; 2 Stark Ev. (5th Am. ed.) 345, 346, notes.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.