Sumner v. Foster
Sumner v. Foster
24 Mass. 32
Opinion of the Court
The plaintiffs having the subordinate right, it is incumbent on them to take notice when there is a deficiency of water, and if there was a deficiency when the defendant made his request, it was their duty to shut their gate ; but when the defendant undertakes to stop the passage of the water himself, he should remove the obstruction so soon as there is a supply sufficient for the use of both parties.
Judgment according to verdict.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.