Oakes v. Hill

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Oakes v. Hill, 25 Mass. 46 (Mass. 1829)

Oakes v. Hill

Opinion of the Court

But at this March term the Court said they had come to the conclusion, that it was not proper to issue a mandamus. They remarked that an action was pending in which the same ques•tions might be tried, and that a determination on this summary *49process might affect the rights of persons who had no opportunity to be heard.1

See Oakes v. Hill, 10 Pick. 333, and 14 Pick. 442.

Reference

Full Case Name
Uriah Oakes, &.c. versus Charles Hill
Status
Published