Phenix Bank in Connecticut v. Sullivan
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Phenix Bank in Connecticut v. Sullivan, 26 Mass. 410 (Mass. 1830)
Phenix Bank in Connecticut v. Sullivan
Opinion of the Court
We are of opinion that the plaintiffs have no right to become parties to the indenture, the six months having expired before they made application for that purpose. The property is assigned, through the trustees, to the creditors who executed the instrument seasonably. Public notice was given, so that all the creditors might have an opportunity of sharing in
Bill dismissed.
See Battles v. Folies, 21 Pick. 239; De Caters v. Le Ray De Chaumont, 2 Paige, 490; Holmes v. Love, 3 Barn. & Cressw. 242; Coe v. Hutton, 1 Serg. & Rawle, 398. See also St. 1838, c. 163.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Phenix Bank in Connecticut versus William Sullivan
- Status
- Published