Commonwealth v. Mahar

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Commonwealth v. Mahar, 33 Mass. 120 (Mass. 1834)

Commonwealth v. Mahar

Opinion of the Court

But the Court being strongly inclined to the opinion that a conviction on such an indictment could not be sustained, thought it was proper to interfere at this time.

The attorney-general then moved to amend the indictment, and the prisoner’s counsel consented that the name of William Hayden, as owner of the house, should be inserted ; not in tending however to admit that Hayden was in fact the owner

But the Court were of opinion, that this was a case ii which an amendment could not be allowed, even with the. consent of the prisoner.

Reference

Full Case Name
Commonwealth versus Thomas Mahar
Status
Published