Case of Brown
Case of Brown
Opinion of the Court
The election of William C. Brown, one of the members returned from the city of Boston, was controverted by Jotham B. Monroe and others, on the ground, that the member returned “ was not an inhabitant of the city of Boston, which be was chosen to represent.”
The committee on elections made the following report: — *
“ Many witnesses were called on the part of the petitioners.
It also appeared, that Mr. Brown was assessed in May last in Chelsea, and paid his tax; and that he was not assessed last year in Boston.
The constitution (c. 1, § 3, article 3,) declares that ‘every member of the house of representatives, for one year at least next preceding his election, shall have been an inhabitant of the town he shall be chosen to represent.5
And the committee are of opinion, upon the facts above recited, that this constitutional requirement is not complied with in the case of Mr. Brown.
The committee therefore report, that William C. Brown is not entitled to a seat in this house.5’ ■
The report in this case was agreed to, and the member allowed his pay to that time.
62 J. H. 112, 131.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.