Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1849

City of Lowell v. Short

City of Lowell v. Short
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Decided October 15, 1849
58 Mass. 275

Counsel

S. Ames, city solicitor, (with whom was B. F. Butler), for the plaintiffs,, J. G. Abbott, for the defendant,

City of Lowell v. Short

Opinion of the Court

By the court.

This case appears to us not to be distinguishable from the case of Lowell v. Boston & Lowell Railroad Corp. 23 Pick. 24. The defendant created the nuisance, and thereby exposed the plaintiff. The parties were not in pari delicto; they were not respectively chargeable in the same default. The claim of the plaintiffs, if they recover, must be limited to single damages only, according to the rule in the case cited. Exceptions sustained

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.