Balcom v. Richards
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The ruling of the court of common pleas, that a payment, made by one of two defendants upon the note before it was barred by the statute of limitations, prevented the statute from running against both, and that it was not important for the jury to consider, whether Jesse F. Richards admitted that the payment was made by himself or Calvin Richards, was erroneous. This subject was fully considered by this court in the case of Peirce v. Tobey, 5 Met. 168, 171, and that decision must govern the present case.
Exceptions sustained.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.