Eames v. Prentice
Eames v. Prentice
62 Mass. 337
Opinion of the Court
held, that where the plaintiff counts in trespass quare clcmsum fregit, he cannot support the action by proving a trespass in taking and carrying away goods only; and overruled Sampson v. Henry, 13 Pick. 36, so far as it is opposed to this view. New trial granted.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.