Eames v. Prentice
Eames v. Prentice
8 Mass. 337
Opinion of the Court
held, that where the plaintiff counts in trespass quare clausum fregit, he cannot support the action by proving a trespass in taking and carrying away goods only; and overruled Sampson v. Henry, 13 Pick. 36, so far as it is opposed to this view. New trial granted.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.