Inhabitants of Hancock v. Hazzard

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Inhabitants of Hancock v. Hazzard, 66 Mass. 112 (Mass. 1853)

Inhabitants of Hancock v. Hazzard

Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

A collector of taxes, by accepting the office, takes the risk of the safe-keeping of the money he has actually received. His obligation is not regulated by the law of bailments, and the cases cited to that effect are inapplicable. He is a debtor, an accountant, bound to account for and pay over the money he has collected. The loss of his money, therefore, by theft or otherwise, is no excuse for non-performance; this is founded on the nature of his contract, and considerations of public policy. United States v. Prescott, 8 How. R. 578. It being a duty of the collector to account for and pay over to the treasurer; Inhabitants of Colerain v. Bell, 9 Met. 499, and the excuse of loss by theft being unavailing, the sureties in the bond are liable equally with the principal.

Judgment on the agreed facts for the plaintiffs.

Reference

Full Case Name
Inhabitants of Hancock v. Thomas J. Hazzard & another
Status
Published