Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1855

Rossiter v. Peck

Rossiter v. Peck
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Decided September 15, 1855
69 Mass. 538

Rossiter v. Peck

Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The record was clearly insufficient to show a valid judgment. Nothing can be presumed in favor of the *539jurisdiction, of courts or magistrates, having only a special or hmited jurisdiction; but the burden is upon those, who claim any rights under their proceedings, to show affirmatively that they acted within the limits of their jurisdiction. Piper v. Pearson, 2 Gray, 124. In the present case, there is nothing to show that the defendant was ever served with process, or had any notice of the acti m in which the judgment was rendered. Prima facie, therefore, the justice had no right to take cognizance of the cause, or to render the judgment sued upon. Brown v. Cady, 19 Wend. 477. Exceptions sustained.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.