Sibley v. Hoar
Sibley v. Hoar
70 Mass. 222
Sibley v. Hoar
Opinion of the Court
Of the construction given to the written contract, the defendants have no ground of complaint, and the plaintiffs make none.
The matters of damage submitted to the jury were too contingent and remote.
The plaintiffs can take judgment for nominal damages, or a New trial in the cou/rt of common pleas.
The plaintiffs elected to take judgment for nominal damages.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.