Montague v. Hayes
Montague v. Hayes
Opinion of the Court
The letter to Mr. Bartlett was a valid offer; and being accepted and acted upon by the parties, it constituted a contract by which either a trust or a partnership was created. And whether a trust or a partnership, Lobdell became accountable for the proceeds of the sales, and this liability devolved upon his administrators.
If the property has been alienated, it having been done ir pursuance of the arrangements between the parties, the title was vested in the purchasers, discharged of the trust; and therefore, if all the property has been alienated, no specific performance. in the way of a transfer of real estate can be decreed.
If the property bought and held under the agreement has been sold, and mortgages taken back by Lobdell to secure the
The case must be referred. to a master to state an account. Lobdell’s estate is to be allowed interest on the half of the purchase money advanced by him for William H. Montague, and is to be allowed for all other moneys advanced and for expenses.
Whether the plaintiff can have a preference over other creditors depends on the question whether the specific trust property or mortgages taken to secure the purchase money on sales thereof remain, or whether the balance, if any, due the plaintiff results only in a sum which is a debt due from Lobdell’s estate. This question will properly arise when the master reports; all other questions to be reserved till the coming in of the report. -
Ordered accordingly.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- George L. Montague v. Francis B. Hayes & others
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published