Commonwealth v. Roland
Commonwealth v. Roland
78 Mass. 132
Commonwealth v. Roland
Opinion of the Court
1. It has been repeatedly decided by this . court, that the words “ not being duly appointed and authorized
2. Alleging a party to have been a common seller in a building is not a charge under the St. of 1855, c. 405, which punishes the habitual use of the building, a different offence. That stat ute does not therefore repeal the earlier St. of 1855, c. 215.
Exceptions overruled.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.