City of Worcester v. Keith
City of Worcester v. Keith
Opinion of the Court
The petitioners are not entitled to a writ ot certiorari to quash the proceedings set out in their petition.
The informality in addressing the petition to the common council, as well as to the mayor and aldermen, if it be one, has been waived by the petitioners. In the first place, in the original proceedings it was treated as a petition addressed only to the mayor and aldermen; it was acted on by them, without sending it to the council for their concurrence, by referring it to
But in the next place, it seems to us that this case comes within the principles settled in Flagg v. Worcester, 8 Cush. 69. The commissioners had full jurisdiction of the subject matter of the petition. The defect relied on is not that the case was not one which came within their cognizance, but only that they had no authority to act in this particular case, because some previous step in the proceedings had not been properly taken. That was the precise objection in Flagg v. Worcester, which was held to have been waived, because it was not taken in an early stage of the proceedings before the commissioners. The case is unlike that suggested in Whately v. County Commissioners, 1 Met. 336, 342, in which a case is supposed by way of illustration where a petition to the commissioners stated on its face such facts as to show that it was one over which they had no jurisdiction to act at all. Petition dismissed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- City of Worcester v. Lydia A. Keith
- Status
- Published