Rowe v. Williams
Cases that cite this one
16 later published cases cite this decision.
- Mittenthal v. Mascagni (Mass. 1903)
- McDermott v. Jamula (Mass. 1958)
- Lane v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Enginemen & Firemen (Or. 1937)
- Blessing v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. (Or. 1936)
- Patton v. Babson's Statistical Organization, Inc. (Mass. 1927)
- Brocklehurst & Potter Co. v. Marsch (Mass. 1916)
- Brodbine v. Inhabitants of Revere (Mass. 1903)
- Cupples v. Alamo Irrigation & Manufacturing Co. (Kan. Ct. App. 1898)
- Miles v. Schmidt (Mass. 1897)
- Sanford v. Commercial Travelers' Mut. Acc. Ass'n of America (New York Supreme Court 1895)
- German-American Insurance v. Etherton (Neb. 1889)
- Reed v. Washington Fire & Marine Insurance (Mass. 1885)
- Savage v. Glenn (Or. 1882)
- Vass v. Wales (Mass. 1880)
- Wood v. Humphrey (Mass. 1873)
- Hood v. Hartshorn (Mass. 1868)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
It is very clear that neither of the objections made by the defendant to the plaintiff’s right to maintain this action can be supported.
1. By the terms of the lease, the rent is due and payable on the first days of October and of April; and neither the time of payment, nor the right to sue for the rent in case of non-payment, is extended or postponed by the provision that the landlord may take possession of the premises after sixty days default of payment. Clun's case, 10 Co. 129 a. Van Rensselaer v. Jewett, 5 Denio, 128, 131, and 2 Comst. 148-150.
2. The clause by which it is stipulated that, if any dispute shall arise between the parties, the question in dispute shall be submitted to arbitrators, whose award shall be final, does not undertake to limit the right of action to the amount to be found due by the arbitrators, or in any way to make that right conditional or dependent upon a submission or offer to submit to arbitration ; and, according to all the authorities, is no bar to an action upon the other covenants in the lease. Scott v. Avery, 8 Exch. 487, and 5 H. L. Cas. 846 et seq. Dimsdale v. Robertson, 2 Jones & Lat. 58. Scott v. Liverpool, 3 De Gex & Jones,
Judgment for the plaintiff
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.