Crehore v. Crehore
Crehore v. Crehore
97 Mass. 330
Cases that cite this one
32 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Arno v. Arno (Mass. 1928)
- Arndt v. Arndt (Ill. App. Ct. 1948)
- Symonds v. Symonds (Mass. 1982)
- Lyman v. Lyman (Conn. 1916)
- Donnelly v. Strong (Mass. 1900)
- Sissung v. Sissung (Mich. 1887)
- Shatford v. Shatford (Ark. 1949)
- Boisclair v. Boisclair (Mass. 1943)
- Dyjak Mistal v. Mistal (Mass. 1943)
- Brazell v. Brazell (Cal. Ct. App. 1942)
- Lindquist v. Lindquist (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1941)
- Morris v. Morris (Superior Court of Delaware 1940)
- Hoff v. Hoff (Md. 1932)
- Miller v. Miller (Baltimore City Circuit Court 1928)
- Clickner v. Clickner (New Jersey Court of Chancery 1924)
- Richardson v. Richardson (Mass. 1923)
- Winner v. Winner (Wis. 1920)
- Gard v. Gard (Mich. 1918)
- Safford v. Safford (Mass. 1916)
- Bahrenburg v. Bahrenburg (New York Supreme Court 1914)
- Wallace v. Wallace (Iowa 1908)
- Lyon v. Lyon (Ill. 1907)
- Smith v. Smith (Mass. 1898)
- Maynard v. Tyler (Mass. 1897)
- Tait v. Tait (Superior Court of New York 1893)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The facts show that the libellant had full knowledge that the libellee was unchaste, before he entered into the marriage contract, and was thereby put on his guard so that he cannot allege that he was induced to contract the marriage by such fraud and deceit on the part of the libellee as will enable him to avoid the contract. Foss v. Foss, 12 Allen, 26.
Libel dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.