Commonwealth v. Blood

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Commonwealth v. Blood, 97 Mass. 538 (Mass. 1867)
Coükt

Commonwealth v. Blood

Opinion of the Court

By the Coükt.

The paper offered as a record was not admissible. There was no proof that the court in California had jurisdiction of the cause and the parties. Although a court of record, its jurisdiction over the subject of divorce is a special authority not recognized by the common law, and its proceedings in relation to it stand on the same footing with those of courts of limited and inferior jurisdiction; so that its powers in the case must be shown and appear to have beén strictly pursued. Exceptions overruled».

Reference

Full Case Name
Commonwealth v. Ivory M. Blood
Cited By
15 cases
Status
Published