Hicks v. McDonnell

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Hicks v. McDonnell, 99 Mass. 459 (Mass. 1868)
Hoar

Hicks v. McDonnell

Opinion of the Court

Hoar, J.

The award of the arbitrators to whom the rule ot court issued could not be accepted while the record showed that another person was substituted in the place of one of them. If the proceeding under the rule first issued was by the agreement of the parties and sanctioned by the court, the record should be amended to show that fact before the award should be accepted.

Acceptance of award set aside, and case remitted for further proceedings.

Reference

Full Case Name
Daniel J. Hicks v. Michael McDonnell
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published