Cushman v. Richards
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Port of Seattle v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. (District Court, W.D. Washington 1938)
- Spencer v. Pringle (Wyo. 1937)
- United States v. Rehwald (United States District Court for the Southern District of California 1930)
- Moody v. Pacific Surety Co. (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The contract must be construed according to the relation of the parties, and the facts existing at the time, with reference to which it was made. The defendants purchased o.
The parties must be understood as contracting for something in which they had an interest. According to the plaintiff’s view, the transaction would not be such a contract, but a kind of wager as to the amount to be recovered by the bank. The superior court adopted the more just and rational construction; and the plaintiff has no good ground of exception.
Exceptions overruled.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.