Commonwealth v. O'Baldwin
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- State v. Whiteneck (Ind. 1911)
- Porter v. Butterfield (Iowa 1902)
- Commonwealth v. Taber (Mass. 1891)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The defendant has no ground of exception to the judge’s instructions or refusals to instruct. Evidence that the person proved to have participated with the defendant was called “Wormald” or “Jo” was sufficient in law to warrant the jury in finding that his name was Joseph Wormald. The question of the amount and weight of the evidence on that point was rightly submitted to the jury. No question appears to have been made at the trial as to the degree to which the jury must be satisfied of the facts which the Commonwealth was bound to prove. Exceptions overruled.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.