Brackett v. Williams
Brackett v. Williams
Opinion of the Court
The petitioner is a creditor. His petition was filed, and the decree of the Probate Court removing the administrator was passed, within two years after the appointment. His claim was not barred, therefore, by the Gen. Sts. c. 97, § 5.
He was not barred by the Gen. Sts. c. 99, § 20 : 1st. because it does not appear that the time for proof of claims before the commissioners had then expired under the Gen. Sts. c. 99, § 4; 2d. because eighteen months after the granting of letters of administration had expired, and it does not appear that it had then been ascertained whether the estate was or was not insolvent in fact; Gen. Sts. e. 99, § 25; 3d. because it does not appear that, upon recovery of the property alleged to have been embezzled, the assets will not “ prove more than sufficient to pay all the debts allowed by the commissioners; ” Gen. Sts. e. 99, § 20 ; 4th. be*
The case must accordingly Stand for hearing.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Josiah Brackett v. James Williams
- Status
- Published