Clapp v. Thayer
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Line v. Mason (Mo. Ct. App. 1896)
- Santa Paula Commercial Co. v. Parkhurst-Davis Mercantile Co. (Kan. 1912)
- Felton v. Aubrey (6th Cir. 1896)
- Brown v. Norton (New York Supreme Court 1888)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The only exception taken is to the refusal to give the instructions prayed for, and we are of opinion that both, of them were rightly refused. Each of them requested the court to decide as matter of law what was purely a question of fact. It was for the jury to decide whether furnishing three hundred and thirty-one frames was a substantial compliance with a contract to furnish such frames βto the number of about four hundred; β as well as whether frames weighing on the average twelve pounds the pair, substantially complied with a contract to furnish frames weighing ten pounds the pair. It is to be observed, as bearing upon the latter point, that the bill of exceptions states that there was evidence tending to show that there would be a variation (how much is not stated) from the patterns in ordinary castings. Exceptions overruled.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.