Inhabitants of Winchester v. County Commissioners
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Gray v. Inhabitants of Everett (Mass. 1895)
- Inhabitants of Dartmouth v. County Commissioners (Mass. 1891)
- Sanger v. City of Newton (Mass. 1883)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
It is contended that the doings of the county commissioners ought to be set aside, because in proceedings for the assessment of damages for land taken for a highway, they allowed a petition for a jury, which had been seasonably filed, to be amended, and permitted the life tenant to become a party to it, after the expiration of the year allowed for such petition. This, it is said, overrides the statute of limitations, and gives a person standing in court who had lost it by lapse of time.
But a petition of this character is in the nature of a civil action. The commissioners exercise judicial power over it, and come within the provisions which allow amendments in form or substance of any process, pleading or proceeding. It was so held in Grand Junction Railroad Co. v. County Commissioners, 14 Gray
Petition dismissed with costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.