Raddin v. Arnold
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Looney v. Trimount Theatres, Inc. (Mass. 1933)
- City of Chelsea v. Richard T. Green Co. (Mass. 1946)
- American Radiator Co. v. Pendleton (Wash. 1911)
- Smith v. Bay State Savings Bank (Mass. 1909)
- Filley v. Christopher (Wash. 1905)
- Donnelly v. Thieben (Ill. App. Ct. 1881)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
It does not appear by the bill of exceptions, and was not suggested at the argument, that there was any evidence that the engine and boiler were set upon the premises without the consent of thé vendor. The only exception relied on is to the refusal of the instruction requested, and to the instruction given; and cannot be sustained. Whatever might have been the right of removal, the engine and boiler, so long as they were affixed to the realty in the manner stated in the bill of exceptions, were not mere chattels and therefore this action in
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.