Cleary v. Sohier
Cleary v. Sohier
120 Mass. 210; 1876 Mass. LEXIS 153
Cases that cite this one
18 later published cases cite this decision.
- Chicago Edison Co. v. Huyett & Smith Manufacturing Co. (Ill. App. Ct. 1896)
- Apahouser Lock & Security Corp. v. Carvelli (Mass. App. Ct. 1988)
- Commonwealth v. Evans (Pa. 1931)
- F. M. Gabler, Inc. v. Evans Laboratories, Inc. (New York Supreme Court 1927)
- Keeling v. Schastey & Vollmer (Cal. Ct. App. 1912)
- Taulbee v. McCarty (Ky. Ct. App. 1911)
- Kinzer Construction Co. v. State (N.Y. Ct. Cl. 1910)
- Vickery v. Ritchie (Mass. 1909)
- Poland v. Face (Me. 1905)
- Teakle v. Moore (Mich. 1902)
- Dolan v. . Rodgers (N.Y. 1896)
- Siegel, Cooper & Co. v. Eaton & Prince Co. (Ill. 1896)
- Siegel, Cooper & Co. v. Eaton & Prince Co. (Ill. App. Ct. 1895)
- Kenwood Bridge Co. v. Dunderdale (Ill. App. Ct. 1893)
- Butterfield v. Byron (Mass. 1891)
- Fairbanks v. Richardson Drug Co. (Mo. Ct. App. 1890)
- Gilbert & Barker Manufacturing Co. v. Butler (Mass. 1888)
- Haynes, Spencer & Co. v. Second Baptist Church (Mo. 1885)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The building having been destroyed by fire without fault of the plaintiff, so that he could not complete his contract, he may recover under a count for work done and materials furnished. Lord v. Wheeler, 1 Gray, 282. Wells v. Calnan, 107 Mass. 514, 517. Judgment for the plaintiff.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.