Trustees of the Chapel of the Good Shepherd v. City of Boston
Cases that cite this one
25 later published cases cite this decision.
- Board of Assessors v. Vincent Club (Mass. 1966)
- Willamette University v. Knight (Or. 1899)
- Bishop v. Gulick (Haw. 1889)
- Assessors of Framingham v. First Parish in Framingham (Mass. 1952)
- Worcester Masonic Charity & Educational Ass'n v. Assessors of Worcester (Mass. 1950)
- Hairenik Ass'n v. City of Boston (Mass. 1943)
- William T. Stead Memorial Center of New York v. Town of Wareham (Mass. 1938)
- Wheaton College v. Inhabitants of Norton (Mass. 1919)
- New England Sanitarium v. Inhabitants of Stoneham (Mass. 1910)
- First New Jerusalem Society v. Richardson (Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County 1910)
- City of Chicago v. University of Chicago (Ill. App. Ct. 1907)
- Gymnastic Ass'n of the South Side of Milwaukee v. City of Milwaukee (Wis. 1906)
- All Saints Parish v. Inhabitants of Brookline (Mass. 1901)
- Trustees of Phillips Academy v. Inhabitants of Andover (Mass. 1900)
- President & Trustees of Williams College v. Assessors of Williamstown (Mass. 1897)
- Hibernian Benevolent Society v. Kelly (Or. 1895)
- German Evangelical Protestant Cemetery v. Brooks (Hamilton Circuit Court 1894)
- German Evangelical Protestant Cemetery v. Brooks (Ohio Circuit Courts 1894)
- St. James Educational Institute v. City of Salem (Mass. 1891)
- Lyceum v. City of Salem (10th Cir. 1891)
- Richardson v. City of Boston (Mass. 1889)
- Suffolk Savings Bank (Mass. 1889)
- Mount Hermon Boys' School v. Inhabitants of Gill (Mass. 1887)
- Lynn Workingmen's Aid Ass'n v. City of Lynn (Mass. 1884)
- Cleveland Library Ass'n v. Pelton (Ohio 1880)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff, by its charter, is “ made a body corporate for religious and charitable purposes,” and is empowered to “ erect, hold, maintain and let lodging-houses within the city of Boston, upon such terms and conditions as it may determine, subject to the laws of the Commonwealth,” as well as to “ erect, hold and establish churches or chapels in said city for public religious worship,” and to hold real and personal estate to the amount of $200,000, “ the whole income of which shall be devoted to religious and charitable uses.” St. 1868, c. 114.
In order to exempt real estate belonging to a charitable institution from taxation, it is not enough that the income derived therefrom should (as all the income of the corporation, from whatever source derived, must) be applied to the purposes for which it was incorporated; but the real estate itself must be occupied by the corporation or its officers, for those purposes. Gen. Sts. c. 11, § 5, cl. 3.
The chapel erected and held by the plaintiff was doubtless occupied by the corporation lor a charitable and religious pur pose, and is admitted to have been exempt from taxation; and lodging-houses let to poor tenants, without compensation, might fall within the same rule.
As part, at least, of the plaintiff’s real estate was not exempt from taxation, this action cannot be maintained. Bourne v. Boston, 2 Gray, 494. And according to the terms of the case stated there must be Judgment for the defendant.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.