Seavey v. Potter
Seavey v. Potter
121 Mass. 297; 1876 Mass. LEXIS 360
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Droege v. Ahrens & Ott Manufacturing Co. (N.Y. 1900)
- In re Kenyon (District Court, S.D. Ohio 1907)
- Standard Varnish Works v. Haydock (6th Cir. 1906)
- In re Hildebrant (District Court, N.D. New York 1903)
- Miller v. Hyde (Mass. 1894)
- Raphael v. Reinstein (Mass. 1891)
- Stevens v. Pierce (Mass. 1890)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The claim of the plaintiff to rescind the sale is wholly inconsistent with his proof in bankruptcy of a promissory note taken for the price of the goods. Ormsby v. Dearborn, 116 Mass. 386. See also Bassett v. Brown, 105 Mass. 551. Exceptions overruled.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.