Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1877

Duffee v. Call

Duffee v. Call
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Decided October 17, 1877 · Gray
123 Mass. 318; 1877 Mass. LEXIS 275
Duffee v. Call

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Gray, C. J.

If a writ duly served is not entered, the defendant, upon appearing pursuant to the summons served upon him and filing a complaint at the first term, is entitled to judgment for his costs. Gen. Sts. e. 120, § 12; c. 129, § 9. Gilbreth v. Brown, 15 Mass. 178, 180. Lombard v. Oliver, 5 Gray, 8. Cardival v. Smith, 109 Mass. 158, 160. And a person summoned as trustee of the principal defends nt has the like right. Gen. Sts. e. 129, § 9. Brown v. Seymour, 1 Pick. 32. The filing of a trustee’s answer, in an action which had been discontinued by the plaintiff’s failing to enter it, was a nullity, and did not waive or affect the right of the trustee to file a complaint for costs at the term at which she had been summoned to appear.

Exceptions sustained.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.