Eidt v. Cutter
Cases that cite this one
19 later published cases cite this decision.
- Calvanese v. WW Babcock Co., Inc. (Mass. App. Ct. 1980)
- Greene v. State (Ind. 1945)
- Green v. State (Ind. 1945)
- Empire Oil & Refining Co. v. Hoyt (6th Cir. 1940)
- Curtis & Gartside Co. v. Pribyl (Okla. 1913)
- Webb v. Depew (Mich. 1908)
- Tackman v. Brotherhood of American Yeoman (Iowa 1906)
- Cheetham v. Union Railroad Company (R.I. 1904)
- American Bell Tel. Co. v. National Tel. Mfg. Co. (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts 1901)
- Samuel Wymond Cooperage Co. v. Thompson (Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati 1900)
- Leslie v. Granite Railroad (Mass. 1899)
- People v. Woon Tuck Wo (Cal. 1898)
- J. N. Kramer & Son v. Messner & Co. (Iowa 1897)
- Fein v. Covenant Mutual Benefit Ass'n (Ill. App. Ct. 1895)
- Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. Champion (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
- Commonwealth v. Leach (Mass. 1892)
- Leonard v. Southern Pacific Co. (Or. 1892)
- Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. Mugg (Ind. 1892)
- Baxter v. Doe (Mass. 1886)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The question in controversy, and upon which both parties had introduced the testimony of experts, was whether the injury to the plaintiff’s house was caused by the fumes and gases from the defendant’s works, or by the emanations from a sewer. The grounds and reasons of the opinions of the experts, including the détails of experiments made by them under conditions and circumstances which, as they testified, were as nearly as possible like those surrounding the plaintiff’s house in the absence of the sewer, were rightly permitted to be stated by the experts, in order to assist the jury in understanding their testimony and applying it to the case. Lincoln v. Taunton Copper Co. 9 Allen, 181. Commonwealth v. Piper, 120 Mass. 185, 190. Williams v. Taunton, 125 Mass. 34. Exceptions overruled.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.