Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1881

Adams v. Stone

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Decided October 21, 1881 · Endicott

131 Mass. 433; 1881 Mass. LEXIS 279

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

MacDonough v. A. S. Beck Shoe Corp. (Superior Court of Delaware 1939)
King v. Northeastern Publishing Co. (Mass. 1936)
Commonwealth v. Szliakys (Mass. 1926)
Lubcke v. Teckam (Wis. 1923)
McCallum v. Lambie (Mass. 1887)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Endicott, J.

The demurrer was properly sustained. The words charged in the declaration as spoken by the defendant do not in themselves impute or imply the commission of a crime. *434They merely state that the plaintiff was intimate with his brother’s wife for a number of years. If the plaintiff intended to prove that the words, as used by the defendant, charged him with the commission of adultery with his brother’s wife, he should have alleged the facts, circumstances or conversation in connection with -which they were spoken and which gave to them this special and peculiar meaning. The innuendo is wholly insufficient for that purpose; it does not enlarge the meaning of the words beyond their natural import. It must appear from the declaration that the words used are actionable. Bloss v. Tobey, 2 Pick. 320. Tebbetts v. Goding, 9 Gray, 254. Goodrich v. Hooper, 97 Mass. 1. Brettun v. Anthony, 103 Mass. 37. York v. Johnson, 116 Mass. 482. Krebs v. Oliver, 12 Gray, 239. Fowle v. Robbins, 12 Mass. 498. Goodrich v. Davis, 11 Met. 473. Carter v. Andrews, 16 Pick. 1.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.