Allen v. Truesdell
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- Kilroy v. Barron (Mass. 1950)
- Vezina v. Souliere (Vt. 1931)
- Dwyer v. Redmond (Conn. 1924)
- Hodges v. . Smith (N.C. 1912)
- Chilson v. Houston (N.D. 1900)
- Bruce v. Fiss (New York Supreme Court 1899)
- Peak v. Frost (Mass. 1894)
- Case v. Stevens (Mass. 1884)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This action is brought to recover damages, not because a horse was not in value as was warranted or represented, but for personal injuries sustained from an unsafe horse, which the plaintiff was induced to use, in the belief that it was safe, by the false and fraudulent representations of the defendant. The offer by the plaintiff was not only to prove a representation that the horse was safe, but that it was “ not afraid of the cars.” These words are not necessarily to be construed as a warranty or representation of what the conduct of the horse would be in the future, rather than the assertion of a fact in regard to the habits or training of the horse; and the whole offer by the plaintiff was in effect to prove that the representations alleged were made by the defendant, and were made falsely and fraudulently; that the plaintiff was induced by them to use the horse in the manner she did, and that they were made in view of such use; that the fright and running of the horse were occasioned by a vice or habit which the defendant, by such representations, had affirmed that it was not subject to; and that
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.