Bean v. Inhabitants of Hyde Park
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- Tuckerman v. Moynihan (Mass. 1933)
- Wood v. Inhabitants of Concord (Mass. 1929)
- Inhabitants of Canton v. Westbourne Cemetery Corp. (Mass. 1925)
- Blaisdell v. Inhabitants of the Town of York (Me. 1913)
- Wormstead v. City of Lynn (Mass. 1903)
- Boston Electric Co. v. City of Cambridge (Mass. 1895)
- McManus v. Inhabitants of Weston (Mass. 1895)
- Blanchard v. Inhabitants of Ayer (Mass. 1889)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
We assume, for the purposes of this case, that the county commissioners of Norfolk, in 1873, relocated River Street in the town of Hyde Park, and determined that the town should construct the way, within three years, according to the location. It became the duty of the town to construct
In the case at bar, there was no vote of the town authorizing the selectmen to finish River Street, or to contract with the plaintiff to work upon it. The vote to appropriate “ $7000 for highways ” did not confer such authority. It was intended for the maintenance and repairs of existing highways, and cannot be construed to authorize the selectmen to pledge the credit of the town for building a new road according to the order of the commissioners. The work for which the plaintiff sues was not work done in the ordinary repairs of the highways; and the Superior Court properly ruled that he could not recover of the town for it. Clark v. Russell, 116 Mass. 455. Todd v. Rowley, 8 Allen, 51.
Exceptions overruled.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.