O'Brien v. Rideout
O'Brien v. Rideout
Opinion of the Court
1. The plaintiff was hired as a common laborer, and the defendant was not present when he was put to work
2. The evidence does not justify a finding that the foreman by whom the plaintiff was set to work upon the saw was a person whose sole or principal duty was that of superintendence. He was “ at work pretty much all the time in getting out lumber, or piling it up, or arranging it, and in operating saws.”
Exceptions overruled.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- John T. O'Brien v. Malcolm E. Rideout
- Cited By
- 10 cases
- Status
- Published