Shawmut National Bank v. Manson
Cases that cite this one
12 later published cases cite this decision.
- Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp. v. Guaranty Bank & Trust Co. (District Court, D. Massachusetts 1958)
- Journal Square National Bank of Jersey City v. Old Colony Co-Operative Bank (Superior Court of Rhode Island 1929)
- Cedar Rapids National Bank v. Snoozy (N.D. 1927)
- Old National Bank v. Gibson (Wash. 1919)
- Aebi v. Bank of Evansville (Wis. 1905)
- Grower's Marketing Service, Inc. v. Webster & Atlas National Bank (Mass. 1945)
- American Barrel Co. v. Commissioner of Banks (Mass. 1935)
- Boston-Continental National Bank v. Hub Fruit Co. (Mass. 1934)
- Bath National Bank v. Ely N. Sonnenstrahl, Inc. (N.Y. 1928)
- Eastern Mutual Insurance v. Atlantic National Bank (Mass. 1927)
- Colonial Fur Ranching Co. v. First National Bank (Mass. 1917)
- Buzzell v. Tobin (Mass. 1909)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The finding of the court, that “ the plaintiff is a bona fide holder for value,” renders the first two requests of the defendant Manson for rulings immaterial. The check was deposited with the plaintiff on the day of its date, and therefore cannot be considered as overdue when it was taken by the plaintiff. See Ames v. Merriam, 98 Mass. 294; First National Bank of Rochester v. Harris, 108 Mass. 514; Bill v. Stewart, 156 Mass. 508.
The plaintiff received the check from the payees, who indorsed it, and credited the amount of- the check to the payees in their account as depositors, and permitted the payees to draw against it before it received notice through the Clearing House that the check had been dishonored. This made the bank a holder for
Exceptions overruled.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.