King v. Daly

It is enough to say that it does not appear, as matter of law, from the facts set forth in the decree, that the plaintiff was- entitled to more relief than was granted. The judge must be taken to have found as an additional fact that more was not necessary to protect the plaintiff’s rights and could not be granted with justice. We cannot say that such a finding was impossible, and we cannot revise the finding as the evidence is not before us.

Decree affirmed.