Demers v. Marshall
Demers v. Marshall
172 Mass. 548; 52 N.E. 1066; 1899 Mass. LEXIS 847
Demers v. Marshall
Opinion of the Court
This case offers another instance of injury sustained. by the presence of a projecting set screw as a part of machinery with which the plaintiff had to do in his work, and is governed by Rooney v. Sewall & Day Cordage Co. 161 Mass. 153, and by Ford v. Mount Tom Sulphite Pulp Co., ante, 544.
Exceptions sustained.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.