Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1899

Derick v. Taylor

Derick v. Taylor
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Decided May 19, 1899 · Holmes
173 Mass. 412; 53 N.E. 919; 1899 Mass. LEXIS 1105

Derick v. Taylor

Opinion of the Court

Holmes, J.

The defendant was entitled to costs by reason of the plaintiff’s having discontinued the action, and so it was adjudged when this case was here before. Derick v. Taylor, 171 *413Mass. 444, 447. See Smith v. Pike, 160 Mass. 24, 26. The complaint for failure to prosecute the appeal was a step in the cause, not an independent proceeding, and may result in the affirmance of the original judgment. Pub. Sts. c. 155, § 34. It follows that costs properly were taxed after the discontinuance.

Taxation affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.