Callahan v. City of Boston

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Callahan v. City of Boston, 175 Mass. 201 (Mass. 1900)
55 N.E. 892; 1900 Mass. LEXIS 734
Holmes

Callahan v. City of Boston

Opinion of the Court

Holmes, C. J.

It is not denied that the defendant is liable to the plaintiff under St. 1892, c. 270, if that statute is constitutional. The effect of that act is that if a city or town sees fit voluntarily to order the construction of public works owned by it, then, nolens volens, it must assume a part of the responsibility of an employer to the workmen employed by the contractor with whom it deals. It is intended to be a milder application of the principle of the mechanic’s lien laws. We see no constitutional objection to the law. It is a familiar type of statute, and has been upheld heretofore. Hart v. Boston, Revere Beach, Lynn Railroad, 121 Mass. 510. A compulsory relation of master and servant is not unknown even to the common law. Benjamin v. Dockham, 134 Mass. 418.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Reference

Full Case Name
Michael J. Callahan v. City of Boston
Status
Published